Yahoo! Mail Litigation, No. 5:13-cv-04980 Northern District of California Classes: Certified Nationwide Class: All persons in the United States who are not Yahoo Mail subscribers and who have sent emails to or received emails from a Yahoo Mail subscriber from October 2, 2011 to the present, or who will send emails to or receive emails from a Yahoo Mail subscriber in the future. Certified California Subclass: All persons in California who are not Yahoo Mail subscribers and who have sent emails to or received emails from a Yahoo Mail subscriber from October 2, 2012 to the present, or who will send emails to or receive emails from a Yahoo Mail subscriber in the future. Attorneys: Frederic S. FoxFFox@kaplanfox.comLaurence D. KingLKing@kaplanfox.comDonald R. HallDHall@kaplanfox.comLinda M. Fong Kaplan Fox is court-appointed co-lead counsel for the plaintiffs in this digital privacy class action, challenging Yahoo’s practice of “scanning” incoming and outgoing emails for content, in order to more effectively target advertising. On August 14, 2014, Judge Lucy Koh denied in part and granted in part a motion to dismiss the case, allowing plaintiffs to pursue a claim under California’s Invasion of Privacy Act. In addition, Judge Koh allowed plaintiffs to pursue a federal Stored Communications Act claim related to Yahoo’s alleged practice of divulging some email content to favored third parties without adequate consent. Bloomberg News reported on the decision, which can be found here. On May 26, 2015, Judge Koh certified a nationwide class of email users related to the federal claim, and certified a California subclass of email users related to the California claim. She also concluded that plaintiffs’ request for injunctive relief “does not bar subsequent individual damages claims by class members, even if based on the same events.” On January 7, 2016, Yahoo agreed to modify its email delivery architecture in a way that the plaintiffs believe would bring Yahoo into compliance with California privacy law. On August 25, 2016, the Court granted final approval of the settlement and awarded fees and expenses. Order Appointing Lead Counsel Order Granting in Part and Denying in Part Defendant’s Motion to Dismiss Order Granting in Part and Denying in Part Plaintiffs’ Motion for Class Certification Settlement Agreement Addendum to Settlement Agreement Order Granting Preliminary Approval of Settlement Motion for Final Approval of Settlement and Entry of Stipulated Injunction Motion for Attorneys’ Fees and Costs and Lead Plaintiff Service Awards Connect with Kaplan Fox. Receive a complimentary case review now. Contact Us Applied Therapeutics, Inc. See the Case Inari Medical, Inc. See the Case Barclays iPath Series B S&P 500 VIX Short-Term Futures ETN See the Case Charles River Laboratories International, Inc. See the Case Digital Currency Group, Inc. See the Case Spectrum Pharmaceuticals, Inc. See the Case Co-Diagnostics, Inc. See the Case Vale SA See the Case Geron Corporation See the Case Hecla Mining Company See the Case Textron Inc. See the Case Ambac Financial Group Securities Litigation See the Case
